P. v. Acosta CA2/2
Defendant and appellant Andrew Acosta (defendant) appeals from his conviction of unlawful possession of a firearm, challenging only the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. He contends that the arresting officer failed to articulate facts demonstrating an objectively reasonable suspicion that defendant was engaged in the unlawful activity cited as grounds for a traffic stop. Finding no merit to defendant’s contention, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Acosta CA2/2