In re Miranda R. CA2/4
Appellant Gary R., Sr. (appellant or Father) appeals the juvenile court order asserting jurisdiction over his two children, a 10-year old girl and a six-year old boy, under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (d), and the dispositional order removing his daughter from his custody. Father contends substantial evidence does not support either of the court’s orders. He further contends he was a noncustodial parent, and that the court relied on the wrong statutory provision in resolving the issue of his daughter’s custody. Our review of the record convinces us that the court’s orders were supported by the evidence, and that its reliance on the statutory provision covering custodial parents in determining that appellant’s daughter could not be placed with him was, at most, harmless error. Accordingly, we affirm.
Comments on In re Miranda R. CA2/4