P. v. Mason CA2/2
Darryl Mason (defendant) appeals his convictions for possessing two kilograms of cocaine and more than $68,000 in drug proceeds. He does not contest the sufficiency of the evidence presented at trial, but instead challenges the trial court’s refusal to grant his motion to acquire law enforcement personnel records under Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 (Pitchess), his motions to dismiss due to the prosecution’s deportation of a material witness and the failure to maintain the cash seized from his house for fingerprinting, his motion to unseal the sealed portion of the affidavit to the search warrant that led to the discovery of the drugs and cash in his house, and his motion to suppress his post-arrest confession. Defendant also argues that the abstract of judgment incorrectly reflects the sentence imposed. Only defendant’s final argument has merit. Accordingly, we affirm his convictions and sentence, but order the abstract of judgment to be modified to reflect
Comments on P. v. Mason CA2/2