legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Wade CA2/2
Roderick Wade (defendant) appeals his convictions for committing various sex crimes against four different girls. He argues that the trial court erred (1) in not severing the counts involving one of his then-wife’s sisters, and (2) in instructing the jury, under Evidence Code section 1108, that it may consider each of the charged offenses as evidence of his propensity to commit the other charged offenses. There was no error. Accordingly, we affirm his 447 year and 4 month prison sentence, but do so with instructions to modify the abstract of judgment to impose the correct amount of fees.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale