Cavic v. Schreiber CA4/3
Danny Cavic identifies in his notice of appeal five underlying trial court orders he claims are erroneous. The notice also lists the eventual entry of judgment dismissing Cavic’s malpractice action against Gary E. Schreiber, Jerome D. Stark, Jerome D. Stark, P.C., other attorneys who formerly represented Cavic, and numerous other defendants. The trial court dismissed the case after Cavic failed to post security required of him as a vexatious litigant.
Comments on Cavic v. Schreiber CA4/3