P. v. Farnese CA6
Defendant Peter Anthony Farnese appeals from the judgment entered following his conviction, after a jury trial, of assault with a deadly weapon. On appeal, he contends comments made by a prospective juror during voir dire likely influenced other jurors, thereby denying him his constitutional rights to confrontation and an impartial jury. He further argues the trial court erred by refusing defense counsel’s request to instruct the jury regarding lawful defense of another. Finding no error, we shall affirm.
Comments on P. v. Farnese CA6