legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Rudyak v. Rudyak CA2/3
Appellants Regina Rudyak and Ginadan Capital, LLC appeal from an order imposing discovery sanctions in the amount of $20,492.50 after they unsuccessfully opposed a motion to compel answers and the production of documents at an oral deposition. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.480, subd. (j).) Appellants contend the Civil Discovery Act (Discovery Act) (§ 2016.010 et seq.) does not authorize monetary sanctions against nonparties and, on that basis alone, they argue the order must be reversed. Contrary to Appellants’ contention, monetary sanctions are authorized “against any party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel,” including a nonparty witness who has been ordered to testify pursuant to a deposition subpoena.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale