DAIMLERCHRYSLER MOTORS COMPANY v. LEW WILLIAMS, INC.
Court correctly denied cross-defendant's anti-SLAPP motion on the ground that the cross-complainant had established the probability of prevailing on each of its claims. Each claim was premised on cross-defendant's breach of letter agreement wherein cross-defendant waived any right to protest the establishment or reopening of a car dealership in a particular geographic region. There could be no dispute that cross-defendant breached the letter agreement by filing protests after expressly agreeing for valuable consideration not to do so.
Comments on DAIMLERCHRYSLER MOTORS COMPANY v. LEW WILLIAMS, INC.