P. v. Johnson CA2/4
Defendant Peter Todd Johnson appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial in which he was convicted of attempted first degree murder (Pen. Code, §§ 664, 187, subd. (a)) and shooting at an occupied vehicle (§ 246). Defendant contends the trial court coerced the jury into rendering a verdict by ordering continued deliberation after a deadlock was announced. He also argues that the court erred in denying his motion to substitute counsel under People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118 (Marsden). We disagree and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Johnson CA2/4