Mark M. v. Superior Court CA2/5
Mark M., a prospective adoptive parent, seeks extraordinary writ review of an order removing minor V.S. after termination of parental rights. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.28; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.456.) Mark contends the juvenile court abused its discretion in determining the permanent removal of V.S. from his home was in the child’s best interest. He further contends the court committed reversible error by excluding the expert testimony of Dr. Bradley McAuliff, and by permitting an attorney of a non-party witness to participate in the dependency proceedings. We reject Mark’s arguments and deny the petition.
Comments on Mark M. v. Superior Court CA2/5