legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re L.P. CA2/4
In this dependency action, the mother (appellant R.M.), half-brother (mother’s son, appellant Paul M.), and presumed father (appellant Jeff P.) of dependent minors L.P. and E.P. appealed from orders terminating parental rights, freeing L.P. and E.P. for adoption, and denying petitions for modification. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 300, 366.26, 388.)
In order to terminate the parental rights of a non-offending, non-custodial presumed father, the law requires a finding, based on clear and convincing evidence, that it would be detrimental to place the children with that parent. We conclude that the order terminating father’s parental rights must be reversed because it is not supported by a proper finding of detriment. The order selecting adoption as the permanent plan also is reversed and the matter is remanded for further proceedings.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale