In re Dixie Lee E.
The juvenile court terminated the parental rights of appellant to his daughter. Appellant contended that (1) he received insufficient notice of the permanency planning hearing; (2) the juvenile court erred by holding the hearing in his absence; and (3) the court erred by failing to conduct a Marsden-type hearing after he requested new appointed counsel. Corbin cannot show detriment because there is no evidence that the minor might benefit from a continuing relationship with him. The order terminating parental rights is affirmed.
Comments on In re Dixie Lee E.