P. v. Starski CA1/2
In January of this year we affirmed the conviction of Edward Robert Starski for “the unlawful practice of law . . . , the misdemeanor charge that was the cornerstone of felony charges of attempted grand theft and two counts of conspiring to commit those offenses.” (People v. Starski (2017) 7 Cal.App.5th 215, 218.) Imposition of sentence was suspended, and defendant was admitted to probation upon specified conditions, one of which was that he not leave the state without the approval of his probation officer or the court. The question presented is whether defendant was legitimately found to have violated that condition, and thereafter ordered to serve 30 days in the county jail.
Comments on P. v. Starski CA1/2