In re A.S. CA3
Mother appeals from the juvenile court’s orders sustaining the Welfare and Institutions Code section 300 petition taking jurisdiction of the two minor children, A.S. and D.B., and removing D.B. from her custody. She contends: (1) the petition fails to state a cause of action; (2) there is insufficient evidence to sustain the jurisdictional findings; and (3) there is insufficient evidence to sustain the removal of D.B. As to the adequacy of the petition, we conclude any deficiency in the petition is harmless based on our conclusion the jurisdictional findings are supported by substantial evidence. We also conclude there is substantial evidence supporting the juvenile court’s order removing D.B. from mother’s custody. We affirm the juvenile court’s orders.
Comments on In re A.S. CA3