legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Holbert
A decision regarding convictions for assault with intent to commit rape and sexual penetration by a foreign object. Appellant claims that the trial court erred by improperly commenting on the evidence, denying his motion for new trial, failing to dismiss the sexual penetration conviction as an included offense of the assault, conducting a jury trial of sentencing factors, instructional error, section 654 error, error in ordering a sex offender fine (§ 290.3) and reimbursement of medical examination costs (§ 1203.1h). Judgment modified to impose new fines, and strike §1203.1h. Remanded to verify Appellant's ability to pay fines. Otherwise, judgment affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale