P. v. Mahoney CA4/3
Defendant Jason Alexander Mahoney appeals from postjudgment orders denying (1) his motion for reconsideration of his earlier motion to strike prior convictions pursuant to Penal Code section 1385, and (2) his motion to strike a current conviction for street terrorism (§ 186.22, subd. (a)) based upon the later decided case of People v. Rodriguez (2012) 55 Cal.4th 1125.
We appointed counsel to represent defendant. Counsel did not argue against his client, but advised the court that after a full review of the record he was unable to find an issue to argue on his client’s behalf. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was given an opportunity to file a written argument in his own behalf, but he has not done so.
Comments on P. v. Mahoney CA4/3