Moore v. Orloff & Associates CA4/3
This is our second look at competing liens against funds belonging, somewhat ephemerally, to Robert Prestwood. The first time around, the contestants were Ronald L. Moore, who had a substantial judgment against Prestwood from the bankruptcy court, and Paul Orloff and Orloff & Associates, APC (Orloff) – Prestwood’s erstwhile lawyers – who asserted an attorney lien. Both were competing for about $17,000 interpleaded by Wells Fargo Bank pursuant to a settlement with Prestwood. Orloff won that round, and Moore appealed.
Comments on Moore v. Orloff & Associates CA4/3