P. v. Van Dusen CA1/1
This is the second appeal arising out of defendant’s conviction for felony animal cruelty. In the first appeal, A142665, we affirmed defendant’s conviction under Penal Code section 597, subdivision (b). Defendant now challenges restitution orders made to two entities–BrightHaven, Inc. (BrightHaven) and Oakland Animal Services (OAS)–for costs related to impounding and caring for the cats defendant neglected. Defendant claims BrightHaven was not entitled to a restitution award. As to OAS, defendant contends the award is not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Van Dusen CA1/1