Parsi v. Rosemary Court Properties CA1/2
Appellant Houri Parsi was a former occupant of premises owned by respondent Rosemary Court Properties, LLC (Properties), which had filed an unlawful detainer action against Parsi, and on which it obtained a default judgment. Parsi thereafter filed a complaint, and then an amended complaint, naming two defendants: Properties and Thomas McCormick (when referred to collectively, defendants). The amended complaint alleged nine causes of action. Defendants filed an answer and then a special motion to strike one of the nine causes of action, the second, styled “[v]iolation of the San Francisco Rent Ordinance.” The trial court granted the motion, concluding that the cause of action was based on protected activity. We conclude otherwise, and we reverse.
Comments on Parsi v. Rosemary Court Properties CA1/2