legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re M.E. CA4/2
C.E. (mother) appeals from the denial of her Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition requesting the juvenile court modify its order bypassing reunification services as to her daughter, M.E, under section 361.5, subdivision (b)(3) (section 361.5(b)(3)). To change or set aside a prior order under section 388, a parent must satisfy two elements: (1) there must be new evidence or a change of circumstance and (2) the modification he or she is requesting must be in the best interest of the child. At the hearing on her petition, mother argued the new evidence or change in circumstances to warrant modification was the fact her trial counsel had rendered ineffective assistance by failing to argue section 361.5(b)(3) was inapplicable as a matter of law. The court found mother failed to satisfy both elements of section 388 and denied the petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale