legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. McClelland CA4/3
We appointed counsel to represent defendant Timothy Patrick McClelland on appeal. Counsel filed a brief which set forth the facts of the case. Counsel did not argue against the client, but advised the court no issues were found to argue on defendant’s behalf. Defendant was given 30 days to file written argument in defendant’s own behalf. That period has passed. We have received no communication from him.
Defendant was convicted of violating Health and Safety Code section 11377, subdivision (a), on July 19, 2011, and sentenced to three years in prison. On November 22, 2012, he was released on supervision, which supervision was scheduled to expire on December 6, 2016. On August 17, 2016, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) filed a petition for revocation of defendant’s parole. CDCR alleged defendant committed three violations. A hearing on the alleged parole violation commenced on September 30, 2016.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale