legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Vaughns
A decision regarding two counts of resisting an executive officer by force or violence and one count of being under the influence of a controlled substance, and found to have suffered six prior convictions within the meaning of Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (a), one of which also qualified under Penal Code sections 667, subdivision (b)(i)/1170.12 (the "Three Strikes" law). Defendant argues that his motion under Penal Code section 995 was improperly denied, that his suppression motion was improperly denied, that there were violations of discovery and of his rights, that evidentiary errors were made during the trial, that findings of his prior convictions were improper, that a doubt should have been declared as to his competency to stand trial, that he was improperly sentenced, and that the proceedings were unconstitutional. Judgment Affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale