P. v. Ambriz CA2/7
Saul Ambriz and Andoreni Lazaro Ocampo were convicted following a jury trial of second degree murder. On appeal Ocampo contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction and raises a number of other challenges to his conviction, including improper instructions, evidentiary error, juror misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel. Ambriz argues only that the trial court improperly admitted gang expert testimony. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Ambriz CA2/7