legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Reed v. Taye CA1/4
Carol Reed (Reed) appeals from six separate orders issued by the trial court in her action for breach of contract, malicious prosecution, and abuse of process filed against respondents, Fessha Taye (Taye), Daniel Murphy (Murphy), and Burnham Brown. Three of the appealed orders grant respondents’ respective motions to strike Reed’s complaint pursuant to section 425.16 of the Code of Civil Procedure, this state’s anti-SLAPP statute. The fourth appealed order is a denial of Reed’s motion to be relieved of dismissal due to a mistake relating to her opposition to the anti-SLAPP motions. Finally, Reed appeals two orders granting attorney fees to Taye and Murphy.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale