P. v. Mancinas CA1/4
In these three consolidated criminal appeals, defendant Christopher Mancinas raises no issues in the first case, No. SCR498868; asks us to reduce his conviction on one count of cocaine possession from a felony to a misdemeanor and remand for resentencing under Proposition 47 in the second case, No. SCR590577; and in the third case, No. SCR595589, seeks reversal of his conviction for actively participating in a criminal street gang under Penal Code section 182.66, subdivision (a) for lack of sufficient evidence. We conclude Mancinas’s appeals in Nos. SCR498868 and SCR590577 are procedurally barred and affirm those convictions. We further conclude there is substantial evidence to support the conviction in No. SCR595589 and affirm in that case as well.
Comments on P. v. Mancinas CA1/4