Hornibrook v. Hornibrook
An issue dealing with an enforcement of a trust, while Appellant, rightly or wrongly, was trying to defeat it. It is reversed on two counts: Appellant did not violate the no contest clause,and Appellant is entitled to reimbursement for funds spent on improvements to the house. Judgment affirmed that Saturn is the Appellant's property, and that the RV condition is a valid and enforceable condition precedent.
Comments on Hornibrook v. Hornibrook