legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Girgis CA4/1
A jury convicted Magdi Girgis of conspiracy to commit murder (Pen. Code, §§ 182, subd. (a)(1), 187, subd. (a); count 1) and first degree murder (§ 187, subd. (a); count 2). It also found true the allegations that Girgis committed the murder for financial gain and to prevent testimony. (§ 190.2, subds. (a)(1) & (10).)
The court sentenced Girgis to prison for life without the possibility of parole.
Girgis appeals. In his opening brief, Girgis argues the prosecutor committed prejudicial misconduct during trial and closing argument. However, we find many of these challenges forfeited because Girgis's trial counsel did not object to several of the statements during the prosecution's closing argument that he now claims are misconduct. In addition, for the challenges to the prosecutor's conduct that are properly before us, we conclude they are meritless.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale