legal news


Register | Forgot Password

M.M. v. Superior Court CA6
Petitioner M.M., mother of the dependent minor A.M., seeks extraordinary writ
relief from a juvenile court’s order setting a permanency planning hearing under Welfare
and Institutions Code section 366.26 (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.452).
1
Mother contends
that the court abused its discretion in failing to offer her additional reunification services
at the 18-month review hearing, because it had found that the services mother had
received were not reasonable. Mother also requests that, “if this matter cannot be decided
before [the June 12, 2017 hearing,] this Court stay the commencement of theSection 366.26 hearing until this proceeding is concluded.” We find no abuse of
discretion and therefore must deny the petition and stay request

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale