In re X.D. CA2/5
H.D. (father) appeals from jurisdictional findings declaring his son, X.D., a dependent under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (a) and (b), and the disposition order removing X.D. from father’s custody under section 361, subdivision (c)(1). Father contends there is insufficient evidence to support the jurisdictional findings and removal order. He further contends there is no evidence to support the court’s finding that the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (Department) made reasonable efforts to prevent removal. We affirm.
Comments on In re X.D. CA2/5