M.R. v. Superior Court CA1/3
M.R. (Mother), mother of 17-month-old S.H., and S.H.’s father, L.H. (Father), separately petition for extraordinary writ review of the juvenile court’s orders terminating their reunification services and scheduling a permanency planning hearing for S.H. under Welfare and Institutions Code, section 366.26 (366.26 hearing). Both parents request a temporary stay of the 366.26 hearing, scheduled for May 10, 2017, pending a ruling on their petitions. Mother contends the court erred in scheduling a 366.26 hearing because there was a substantial probability that S.H. could be returned to her care within the next six months. Father contends the court erred in declining to award him additional reunification services. Both parents contend they did not receive reasonable services. We reject the parents’ challenges, and therefore deny their petitions and stay requests.
Comments on M.R. v. Superior Court CA1/3