heatham v. State Personnel Board CA3
Plaintiff Brandy Cheatham filed a petition for a writ of mandate that sought to
overturn a decision of defendant State Personnel Board (Board), which had sustained her
dismissal from employment with real party in interest Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation (Department). The trial court denied the petition.On appeal, plaintiff contends she did not have any notice that the “discourteous”
treatment of a coworker or member of the public could be the basis for dismissal; the
Board improperly considered uncharged conduct in rendering its decision; and dismissal
was excessive punishment for her misconduct. We shall affirm the judgment.
Comments on heatham v. State Personnel Board CA3