legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Anaya CA4/2
Defendant and appellant, Pedro Eusevio Anaya, appeals from an order denying his Proposition 47 petition (Pen. Code, § 1170.18, subd. (a)) for resentencing on his 2008 convictions for receiving stolen property (§ 496, subd. (a)). On appeal, defendant does not challenge the court’s denial of his petition but contends we must order the abstract of judgment corrected to accurately reflect his sentence. The People agree, as do we. We therefore affirm the order denying his petition and remand with directions to correct the abstract of judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale