legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Hobley CA2/2
Defendant and appellant Timothy Hobley (defendant) appeals from an order denying his motion and petition for writ of habeas corpus, in which he requested reduction of the restitution fine imposed at sentencing in 2002. After defendant’s appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), raising no issues, we notified defendant of his counsel’s brief and gave him leave to file his own brief or letter stating any grounds or argument he might wish to have considered. Defendant submitted a supplemental brief raising the same issues rejected by the trial court. We have reviewed defendant’s supplemental brief and the entire record, and find no merit to defendant’s contentions. Finding no other arguable issues, we affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale