Harris v. Discount Beauty Supply CA1/4
Appellant Constance Harris appears to appeal from an order entered June 10, 2015, granting respondent’s motion for terminating sanctions due to appellant’s failure to comply with discovery orders. First, assuming this order is itself appealable, appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed until June 9, 2016, almost one year after the June 10, 2015 order was filed, and notice of entry of judgment (Judicial Council Form CIV-130) was filed. Thus, the time for appeal had long since passed. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.104(a).)
In addition, appellant’s briefs present a confusing compilation of disjointed historical facts and claims that fail to comply with many fundamental rules of appellate procedure.
Comments on Harris v. Discount Beauty Supply CA1/4