P. v. Stevens CA5
Blair Joseph Stevens participated in the robbery and beating of a man in a park.
He was found guilty of robbery, assault by means of force likely to cause great bodily
injury, and battery causing serious bodily injury. On appeal, he argues that the
convictions should be reversed because the accomplice testimony used against him was
not sufficiently corroborated within the meaning of Penal Code section 1111.1
He alsoargues that the sentence imposed for the assault should have been stayed pursuant to
section 654 instead of ordered to run concurrently. We will affirm
Comments on P. v. Stevens CA5