Marriage of Cedeno CA2/1
Appellant Eduardo Cedeno challenges the family court’s denial of his request for an order terminating his spousal support obligations to respondent Bertila Cedeno. Eduardo argued that because Bertila had begun receiving Social Security benefits and pension payments, she no longer needed spousal support. The family court denied Eduardo’s request to terminate spousal support, and instead reduced Eduardo’s monthly obligations from $1,700 to $1,150. We affirm, subject to a modification to allow Eduardo to recover a $650.49 overpayment.
Comments on Marriage of Cedeno CA2/1