legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Hackett CA3
Appointed counsel for defendant Robert Eugene Hackett, Jr., has filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asks this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we affirm the judgment.
We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)
On July 25, 2015, defendant and his girlfriend, Ashley F., had an argument. Ashley F. called 911 and reported that defendant was drunk, had destroyed the house, and left on foot but may come back. A neighbor heard screaming from defendant’s house. Later, when she went outside, Ashley F. was holding a baby and asked to use her phone.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale