P. v. Manago CA4/1
In this criminal case, appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief presenting no
argument for reversal, but requesting that this court review the record for error in
accordance with People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). We offered defendant
Von Ryan Manago the opportunity to file his own brief on appeal and he filed a
2 supplemental brief, which we address below. After independently reviewing the record
for error, as required by Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders) and Wende,
we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Manago CA4/1