P. v. Acosta CA2/4
Emir Rigoberto Acosta and Fredy Rojas appeal from judgments and sentences arising from the shooting death of Fredy Rojas’s cousin, Antonio Rojas. Fredy contends there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for voluntary manslaughter. Acosta contends there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding that he was the shooter. Acosta further contends that the in-court identification of him by several witnesses was improper, and that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury to consider the evidence against each defendant separately. For the reasons set forth below, we find no reversible error and, accordingly, affirm.
Comments on P. v. Acosta CA2/4