Rawson v. YD Enterprises CA4/1
YD Enterprises, LLC (YD) appeals a judgment after a court trial in which the
court determined YD breached a warranty in an agreement for the sale of residential
income property to Teddy and Tamala Rawson (the Rawsons) providing the property was
"legally approved as [two] units." The court determined the remedy of rescission of the
agreement was appropriate based upon mutual mistake of fact because one unit was not
actually permitted or habitable. The court awarded consequential damages incurred by
the Rawsons related to the purchase of the property, which the court offset by the net
income the Rawsons received during the time they possessed the property. YD contends
on appeal (1) the court erred in interpreting the purchase agreement because the property
was legally approved to have two units, whether or not those units were permitted or
habitable; (2) the court erred in rescinding the sale and awarding consequential damages;
and (3) the court erred in awarding attor
Comments on Rawson v. YD Enterprises CA4/1