In re G.M. CA4/3
H.M. (Mother) appeals from an order terminating her parental rights over
her son, now 16-year-old G.M. She contends the juvenile court erred by denying her
visitation before the permanency hearing and by determining that the Indian Child
Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA; 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) did not apply.
We affirm. Mother’s submission in the juvenile court on the visitation
order and failure to object to it when it was made or at any time leading up to or during
the permanency hearing, resulted in a forfeiture, preventing Mother from raising that
issue on appeal. There is no evidence the juvenile court erred in finding ICWA
inapplicable to G.M.
Comments on In re G.M. CA4/3