legal news


Register | Forgot Password

n re M.C. CA4/3
Jennifer C. (mother) appeals from an order terminating parental rights to
her four-year-old daughter M.C. (born October 2011) (Welf. & Inst.Code, § 366.26; all
statutory references are to this code). She contends the juvenile court erred in failing to
apply the “continuing benefit” exception to termination of parental rights. (§ 366.26,
subd. (c)(1)(B)(i) [termination of parental rights detrimental where parent has
“maintained regular visitation and contact with the child and the child would benefit from
continuing the relationship”].) For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.1

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale