Jones v. City of Pasadena CA2/1
Plaintiff David Daryl Jones, in pro. per., appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendant City of Pasadena (City) after the trial court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment.
Because appellate courts presume the order of the trial court is correct, the burden is on the appealing party to demonstrate error, which necessarily includes providing an adequate record for this court to conduct a meaningful review of the trial court’s actions. Here, the record on appeal does not contain the pleadings, the papers filed in connection with the summary judgment motion, or the reporter’s transcript from the summary judgment hearing. Without these documents, we cannot review the trial court’s summary judgment order. Accordingly, we affirm.
Comments on Jones v. City of Pasadena CA2/1