In re J.M. CA2/8
On appeal, mother challenges the juvenile court’s jurisdictional and dispositional order. (Father is not a party to this appeal.) Mother argues that she had rectified all of the concerns underlying the Welfare and Institutions Code section 300 petition prior to the jurisdictional hearing. She also argues that the juvenile court should not have removed her three children from her custody or ordered her to take 10 random drug tests. We find no error and affirm.
Comments on In re J.M. CA2/8