legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Ashton P. CA2/4
Appellant G.A. (Mother) appeals the order terminating parental rights over her son, Ashton P., contending the juvenile court and the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) failed to comply with the requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq., ICWA) prior to terminating parental rights. On the record before us, we find that DCFS failed to comply with its duty to adequately inquire into Ashton’s possible status as an Indian child by interviewing Mother’s father, the relative Mother identified as having information about possible Indian ancestry. Accordingly, we conditionally reverse and remand for ICWA compliance.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale