P. v. Saunders CA5
A jury convicted defendant Bobby Saunders of possessing a weapon while in a penal institution. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred at sentencing by not exercising its discretion to designate the term it imposed for the current in-prison offense as the subordinate term and designating as the principal term the term it imposed for defendant’s previous conviction of another in-prison offense, and by not dismissing the prior strike conviction and prior prison term allegations found true by the jury. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Saunders CA5