legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Coastal Hills Preservation v. County of Sonoma
This case is before us a second time, our first opinion in this matter having been filed on August 31, 2016. (Coastal Hills Rural Preservation v. County of Sonoma (Aug. 31, 2016, A145573), review granted and opn. ordered nonpub. Nov. 22, 2016, S237655 (Coastal Hills I).) Subsequently, the Supreme Court granted the petition for review filed by plaintiff Coastal Hills Rural Preservation (CHRP), ordered our opinion depublished, and transferred the matter to us for reconsideration following that court’s recent decision in Friends of College of San Mateo Gardens v. San Mateo County Community College Dist. (2016) 1 Cal.5th 937 (San Mateo Gardens). The specific page references in the Supreme Court’s order focus our reconsideration on a point relevant to our discussion of the how courts are to evaluate a public agency’s response to modifications made to projects initially approved via negative declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As we will explain, we c

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale