Hayes v. Kardosh CA1/2
John Hayes appeals from a judgment against him in his former landlord’s ejectment action. Hayes maintains that the parties’ rights must be determined under a 1997 lease that the trial court found had been superseded by a different lease in 2000. Hayes argues that he is entitled to judgment under the terms of the 1997 lease, the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to allow him to introduce evidence on the meaning of the 1997 lease, and the trial court erroneously instructed the jury that he had the burden of proving the landlord’s dominant motive in evicting him was not a valid basis for eviction. We affirm.
Comments on Hayes v. Kardosh CA1/2