In re G.H. CA3
George H. (father) and Nancy T. (mother) appeal from the juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings and dispositional orders placing the minors with mother under dependent supervision and granting services to both parents. Mother contends no substantial evidence supports the court’s jurisdictional findings as to her, and therefore the court’s dispositional orders based on those findings were an abuse of discretion. Father contends the court erred by not ordering informal supervision; he also joins in mother’s arguments.
The Sacramento County Department of Health and Human Services (the department) contends father’s argument is forfeited because he did not object to dependent supervision below, and so far as he objects to the court’s orders as to mother he lacks standing to do so. The department contends mother’s argument is moot because it goes to only one of the three grounds raised for jurisdiction. Assuming arguendo that the parents’ contentions are properly befo
Comments on In re G.H. CA3