legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Strong
Defendant was convicted of embezzlement and grand theft. Defendant was placed on probation, ordered to spend 180 days in county jail, and ordered to pay restitution to the victims. Defendant appealed and Court affirmed the judgment. Defendant moved to modify the conditions of her probation by reducing the amount of restitution. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied the motion. Defendant contends she was denied due process because the court did not issue a statement of decision giving its reasons for its decision. Court affirms because the trial court was not required to state reasons and its ruling was otherwise proper.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale